What Kind of Artist-Leader Are You?

Moving into this week and the theme of “Artist as Pastor” I made the personal assumption that an artist always has a particular spiritual function in the body of Christ. This idea is implied by Blaine Hogan in the post which inspired this whole exploration.

Prior to reading Hogan’s thoughts, I’ve often thought of the artist not in the role of Pastor, but in the role of Prophet. The more I mull over this topic, the more I am convinced that the Artist role in the church is neither. Or, rather, the Artist role is both, and more.

APEPT is an acronym that Alan Hirsch uses to describe the fivefold ministry of the saints in Ephesians chapter 4. It stands for: Apostle, Prophet, Evangelist, Pastor/Shepherd, Teacher. (It has been renamed APEST subsequent to the publishing of The Forgotten Ways.)

Hirsch concludes that these leader roles build upon one another. Apostle is foundational. An indication of its importance is that it always comes first in New Testament ministry lists. According to Alan, it is important because the apostolic role “creates the primary field of New Testament ministry.” (Hirsch, The Forgotten Ways, Brazos Press, 2006, 158.)

Think about it. An apostle (‘sent one’) is the first to visit an unreached people or neglected cultural group, introducing the idea of Jesus. With this introduction, a spiritual milieu is created into which the prophet can speak. The apostle has partnered with the Spirit to establish “the covenant community” (local church). The nature of this new community is then shaped by the prophet who calls the covenant people to deep faithfulness. Authentic and deep faithfulness is the fertile plain for the planting of evangelistic seeds. The evangelist makes the specific call to relationship with Jesus through the gospel. Without the prior work of apostle and prophet, the evangelist’s work is harder if not complete vanity. Next, as individuals hear God’s call through the evangelist, they are ready to be shepherded through a continuing process of discipleship. This is where the pastor role comes into play. Finally, the teacher gives explicit instruction in Christlikeness to disciples in process. (Go here for an excerpt of Hirsch’s book on APEPT/APEST, 169 ff.)

The local church needs all of these roles. They are all necessary and each builds upon the other. Leave one out and a vital aspect of the covenant community of God lags or is absent altogether.

This in mind, which would you say is the primary function of the artist? Apostle? Prophet? Evangelist? Pastor? Teacher? I am newly inclined to say that all of these are viable and realistic options.

What I’m saying is, the term Artist ought to be hyphenated in the realm of church leadership. Artist is not a synonym for Pastor. Artist is not a substitute term for Prophet. Artist belongs paired with one or more New Testament leader roles based on the individual artist’s spiritual gifts and calling. Then, the hyphenate “Artist” creatively modifies the leader role with which it is paired.

So, what might these Artist-hyphenates look like?

The Apostle-Artist: Creates art that develops an environment, which is open to spiritual dialogue, not necessarily dialogue of an explicitly Christian kind. Think missionary who spends several years learning-sharing culture in a foreign land before ever cracking a Bible with people.

The Prophet-Artist: Creates art that challenges the status-quo and re-envisions reality in kingdom of God terms. Think Old Testament prophet who’s job it was to “nurture, nourish, and evoke a consciousness and perception alternative to the consciousness and perception of the dominant culture around us.” See Walter Bruggemann’s The Prophetic Imagination (Fortress Press, 1978), 13.

The Evangelist-Artist: Creates art that explicitly articulates the gospel or tells of the kingdom. DON’T think kitschy bumper-stickers and graphic pamphlets.

The Pastor-Artist: Creates art that has a shepherding effect. Think liturgical art that nurtures disciples who gather for worship. Also, think non-liturgical art that somehow encourages the spiritual direction of followers of Christ, regardless of the venue in which it is seen, heard, smelled, tasted, or touched.

The Teacher-Artist: Creates art that provides specific training in Christ-likeness. Think Jesus with his parabolic tales and Rob Bell’s Nooma videos.

If you disagree with these hyphenated options for artistic roles in the church, I’d love to hear your response along with an alternative theory. If you agree, what I’d really like to know is: Which one are you?

Which New Testament leader role modifies your existence as an artist?

Share
Share

Worship Space and Worship Focus

There is a profoundly beautiful Sanskrit text that tells us that God could have chosen any means imaginable to manifest the universe and he chose to use his voice. To see the poetry in that idea means that we also see the subversive power and soul-source of our voices, both in what we say and how we say it. No doubt, we as people of God have another poetic connection with this when we remember that Christ is the Word of God, the Logos, the manifestation of God in bone, flesh, and soul.

This idea was part of the great controversy that Luther created in the Church – this tension between teachings that the Scriptures were so mysterious and complex that they could not be understood by a generally illiterate and simple people and the opposite idea that God was present in the Word, in the scriptures, and that all people should have access to these great truths in an unfettered way. Don’t pull out the tar and fire yet, but I have to say that I think both groups were right. Either way, both institutions of God-loving people were inviting the masses into an encounter with God through the mystery of his spoken word; and, like in every great hinge point in history, we flung the door so wide open that we’ve almost forgotten what we’ve passed into.

Something peculiar happened in community worship after the Reformation. The altar was slowly moved out of the way (or taken out completely) and the pulpit began to move its way to the front and center of the room. This is the phenomenon of focus. We are wired to be visual and ritualistic even when we are not cognitive about it. It is a naturally recurring element in nature and design that whatever is at the center of your focus is what you worship, what you venerate. So this not so subtle shift also marked a momentous transition in the faith community’s priorities in worship.

Perhaps the greater shift, however, was the change in how the people experienced the revelation of God, where they tasted the incarnation and mercy. No longer was God to be found in the mysterious yet familiar ritual of sacraments, in the torn bread and bitter wine, but now our soul’s ultimate nourishment was in the spoken word and in the proclamation.

With these new barren altars and re-adjusted priorities, there came another great wind: Pietism. Suddenly, scripture and teaching had a new purpose in the community worship time: to teach people how to live, to give them a moral road-map, to teach them how to be good. This is the tradition from which we have evolved. Three points and an application. Concrete life examples. Quirky anecdotes. Lunch time conversations rating the sermon and its practical usefulness for our lives. People will arrive to church twenty minutes late and leave early as long as they don’t miss the sermon. The “singing” is just warm-up anyway, like a pre-game show, and that’s not really about Truth, anyway, right? This is where we are as a culture and it raises some interesting questions.

Hear me out, I believe passionately that we should be disciples of the Rabbi Jesus, that we should intentionally and prayerfully study the Scriptures and that our world-view should ultimately be shaped by the narrative of Christ’s life. This is an important part of my life. But the Scripture is more than a road-map or moral compass. It’s the revelation of God, the epic story of God’s pursuit of man. So it begs the question: in our ritual of worship, in our celebration and affirmation of God’s presence, what is the role of teaching in our worship time? What is the priority of teaching in our worship time?

Have I hit a nerve yet? Trust me, I’m not questioning the place of proclamation during our community gathering. I’m pushing back on the idea that we gather to get a moral lesson for the day. The great Fathers and Mothers of the Church saw this time (this second movement of Word) as part of the worship service. There was something in the ritual of this practice that was about seeing God, hearing God, and responding in worship. In truth, the teaching time was more pointedly the doorway into the Eucharist, the recognized feast of God’s revelation.

Most of us aren’t teaching pastors nor do we really have any element of control over the length of the teaching time, the topics, the intention, etc. Most of us are there to prop up the sermon well through creative elements, transitions, and the worship planning. But we still need to ask the question: what is the role of Word, of spoken proclamation, in our worship gathering. If it’s simply a teaching time, we’ve somehow missed the boat. Beneficial time, sure, but not transformative.

What if we could all agree that the teaching time is ultimately rooted in revealing God through the story, drawing us closer to Christ through some flicker of new introduction to his heart and his face? This is very abstract but we’ll talk about it more next week. In the meantime, this could be a powerful meditation for the Church. Your ideas may be the sparks to light a fire somewhere else. Share your ideas. Ruminate on the Narrative. Find God in the sacred spoken things. Next week, let’s start a conversation on practicing the revelation of God in our teaching times and in our Scripture readings.

May the voice of Yahweh peel through the fog and the din of our false realities so that we may be people of honesty and intention.

Share
Share

The Stranger Named Jesus

Jesus exalted the value of hospitality to strangers when he shared with his disciples the intimate spiritual and physical link between welcoming him and welcoming others. This is what he told them:

When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.

Matthew 25:31-46 (TNIV)

Share
Share

Making Womb

This post was written by Christop Booth.

Sometimes hospitality in worship means creating a “safe, comfortable” space in which people can freely respond to God. In this post, Christop Booth shares an example of curating worship that welcomes prayer through an inviting environment.

At my church we have recently been exploring what it means to practise our faith. Each week we have looked at a different Christian practises. During the week leading up to Sunday May 15, we were exploring the practise of testimony – telling our stories. As I reflected on the scriptures we were reading together I found myself particularly impacted by the introduction to the book of Jeremiah (1:1-10). Jeremiah doubts his ability to speak for YHWH, because he’s only a boy. This is despite the fact that YHWH claims to have been involved in Jeremiah’s life, preparing him to be a prophet, since he was in his mother’s womb. I wondered how many of our congregation would be able to relate to Jeremiah, feeling as though we can’t speak for God?

As an option for the response time we normally have after Sunday’s sermon I decided I wanted to create a safe, comfortable kind of ‘womb space’ for folks to sit in. I hoped that this might provide a place to think and pray about where God has been present in our lives, and how they might share that story.

During Advent in 2008 I had been involved in turning the baptistry at Footscray Baptist Church into a womb installation, as a way of engaging with the idea of the virgin birth. We lined the baptistry with black plastic and bubblewrap, lit it in red, projected an ultrasound video into the water and played a heartbeat sound-effect in the space.

This time the idea that came to mind was to hang a parachute as a kind of canopy in one of the stairwells that opens into the space where our congregation meets.

From outside the parachute I projected an animation loop of a foetus, shone some lights, and played a heartbeat sound-effect. (I had hoped to have time to go to a hardware store and buy some red light bulbs, but ended up having to try colouring in some white bulbs with markers! This ended up creating a softer, pinker coloured light, which I think in the end was nicer.) Underneath the canopy we placed some candles in red jars and scattered some cushions for folks to sit on. I also left a Bible open at the beginning of Jeremiah.

Text and Images © Christop Booth


Christop and his wife Mehrin live at the Indigenous Hospitality House, where they host Aboriginal families who are in Melbourne on Hospital business. Christop is also involved in the work of Collins Street Baptist Church and its mission partner Urban Seed. He is studying part-time at Whitley College.

Christop blogs at wonderfulawful.net and tweets @ChristopBrooks.

Share
Share

Speaking (Babbling, Really) of Unity and Diversity at Pentecost

Pentecost. It’s about the Spirit. The one poured out in Joel 2. The one Jesus promised upon his earthly departure. Pentecost. It’s about the birth of the Church, the official initiation of our mission in the world as Christ’s body. Pentecost. It’s about God’s desire and plan for unity through diversity.

Wait… Wha?!

Though not usually the first thing we associate with Acts 2:1-13, the Day of Pentecost can be seen as a fresh revelation of unity, especially when interpreted in light of Genesis 11:1-9.

Genesis 11:1-9 contains the story of the Tower of Babel. Here, a relatively new humanity, possessing only one world-wide language, finds a place in the East to build a city. The people intend the city to deter God’s children from being “scattered over the face of the whole earth.” Central to this story is the construction by the people of a tower that “reaches to the heavens.”

Most often, human hubris is associated with this tower tale. In our bad habit of moralizing the scripture text, we call Babel a warning against pride, the kind of pride that finds humans flirting with god-status. After all, God does seem a little nervous as he says, “If… they have begun to do this… nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them.” (v.6)

But perhaps, as some scholars have suggested, Babel is not primarily about human hubris, but about God’s plan for human unity. From a human perspective, unity and “scattering” are opposites. The divine plan for unity, however, calls not for social similiarity, but for cultural diversification. This is not the first time Yahweh has been seen to act in ways counter to human intuition.

Overlaying Acts 2 and Genesis 11 clarifies even further God’s unique definition of unity. Both stories have to do with communication, confusion, and sending. In Genesis, one language is turned into many, confusion ensues, and God’s plan for humans to ‘fill the earth’ is re-enacted.

In Acts, Galileans who naturally speak a single language, supernaturally speak the languages of “every nation under heaven.” Confusion again ensues, leading to another “scattering” abroad, this time with a redemptive purpose: ‘filling the earth with the kingdom of Jesus.’

In neither story is God pushing for homogeneity. The opposite is true. God is not interested in mono-culture, otherwise, he would have left language alone at Babel. At Jerusalem, he would have displayed the Spirit’s power by teaching all the foreigners to speak Aramaic. Cultural diversity is promoted as the LORD’s personal preference in both Genesis and Acts. Additionally, the granting of the Spirit to the Church – along with the multi-plex of giftings she imparts – further promotes God’s version of unity in diversity.

God, then, is not seeking conformity or uniformity, but affirming variety. Christ functions as the head of a body that breathes and bleeds as one, yet has unique members, each as distinct as toe from tongue and knee from nose.

How would this approach to interpreting Pentecost alter our curation plans? Essentially, we have gained another valid theme for focusing our celebration. This year (or perhaps next, if you aren’t the last-minute type!) you may consider how the theme of ‘unity in diversity’ would take shape in the context of your worshipping community. Consider the following curation ideas a kick-start…

Forget the doves, flames and the color red. What other sorts of visuals will invite the prayerful consideration of multi-cultural validation and spiritual unity? Globes? Multi-colored tapestries? A live, projected kaleidoscope? Maps?

Have a communal meal, a potluck in which each person signs up to bring a dish from a different culture. Talk about the wide variety of tastes and smells. Enjoy the unity that sharing such diverse food brings to those who eat it together.

Emphasize unity through the sharing of ONE loaf and ONE cup, instead of focusing the Eucharist solely on giving thanks for the forgiveness we’ve received through Christ. Use an additional text like: Romans 12:4-8 to connect Christ’s body with both unity and diversity.

Have Acts 2:1-13 read out loud in multiple languages – at literally the same time. In doing so, you illustrate the confusion and chaos that can occur on the surface even when the same “word” is being spoken in agreement.

Offer up prayers for fellow believers throughout the world – including across the street. Pray for cultural validation by missionaries. Pray for unity among believers, especially in locations where persecution is prevalent.

Create some interactive stations based on the Tower of Babel story in Genesis 11:1-9. e.g. Invite people to play Jenga while sharing one personal “tower” he/she regularly builds to delay being “scattered” by God beyond cultural comfort.

What ideas would you add?

Image © iStockphoto

Share
Share